Posts tagged ·

d300

·...

Adobe LR 2.0 profiles compared to Capture NX profiles, landscapes

2 comments

As explained in http://blog.anands.net/2008/08/07/camera-profiles-beta-in-lightroom-20/, I started to compare camera profiles for Nikon D300 in LR 2.0 and NX.

Here is a comparison for a landscape image, shot earlier in 2008 in Yosemite National Park.

NX camera standard

NX camera standard

LR Camera Standard

LR Camera Standard

NX Neutral

NX Neutral

LR Neutral

LR Neutral

NX Vivid

NX Vivid

LR Vivid

LR Vivid

NX D2X Mode1

NX D2X Mode1

LR D2x Mode 1

LR D2x Mode 1

NX D2X Mode 2

NX D2X Mode 2

LR D2x Mode 2

LR D2x Mode 2

NX D2x Mode 3

NX D2x Mode 3

LR D2x Mode 3

LR D2x Mode 3

LR Landscape

LR Landscape

My verdict. It is very close again. I really do not see much difference in using either LR and NX now.

Alaska photos

2 comments

I returned from a 5 day trip to Juneau and Sitka, Alaska this week.

I have uploaded photos to my blog and gallery.

Gallery:

- Juneau
- Whale watching
- Sitka Ferry
- Sitka

Panoramas:

- Whale flip 1
- Whale flip 2
- Whale flip 3
- Juneau ferries and mountains
- Mountains of Juneau

Active D-Lighting in D300 handles high contrast scenes very well.

no comments

Arvind suggested [in the comments] I try Active D-Lighting for high contrast scenes with the D300.

Yes, it makes a huge difference.

First, the photo edited through LR with the default settings:

Edited through lightroom:

High contrast through LR

The same photo edited through Capture NX with default settings:

High contrast scene with Active D Lighting through Capture NX

Edited through Capture NX.

Capture NX and D300 handle high contrast scenes very very well with Active D-Lighting set to on.